728x90
my iParenting
From Our Sponsors
e-newsletters
Sign up to receive our free weekly e-newsletters

new terms of use
new privacy policy
award-winning products
The iParenting Media Awards program helps parents find the best products for their families.
Home › Articles › Considering Pregnancy › Dollars & Sense of Infertility Treatment

Dollars & Sense of Infertility Treatment

How to Pay for Medical Care When You're Trying to Conceive

By Michele St. Martin

Pages:  1  2  3  4  

Infertility treatment is not an easy path. Along with the physical discomfort, emotional ups and downs and often a lack of understanding by family and friends, most of those who choose to try to build their families through infertility treatment also face steep financial implications. Infertility treatment is rarely covered by insurance, except in the states of Illinois and Massachusetts, which have laws mandating coverage for infertility treatment. And even in those cases, not everyone is covered.

Exceptions to the Rules
*Melanie Dwyer of Chicago, Ill., is lucky to live in a state that mandates insurance coverage, but there are always exceptions to laws, and in Illinois, self-insured companies are exempted. At the time she began treatment, Dwyer's employer self-insured, but she wasn't totally out of luck; they did offer some infertility coverage, with a $10,000 lifetime maximum benefit.

To put this in perspective, one IVF cycle can easily cost $10,000 or more, and since IVF is rarely the first step in infertility treatment, most, if not all, of the benefit can be used up before getting to IVF. As a result, Dwyer switched her insurance coverage to her husband's plan, which will cover multiple IVF attempts.

Two teachers from St. Charles, Ill., made national news when they sued their self-insured school district. The teachers' employer provides no coverage for infertility treatment. The women, Lisa Mack and Angela Moreau, sought coverage for infertility treatment, claiming that the school district's policy both violates the Americans with Disabilities Act and discriminates against women. The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) ruled that there was "reasonable cause to believe that the district has discriminated against a class of employees on the basis of disability by maintaining a health benefits plan that excludes coverage for (the women's) disability." The EEOC issued a letter allowing the women to sue the district in federal court.


Pages:  1  2  3  4  

Want to see more?

Comments

There are no comments for this article yet.Be the first to add a comment.

Post As:
Enter your comment below:
Title
Comment Text
CAPTCHA
Please note that any comments submitted become the property of Disney Family / iParenting and can be edited and posted at our discrection.